Followers Of Christ

From “Practice in Christianity”
by Søren Kierkegaard, 1813-1855

It is well known that Christ consistently used the expression “follower.” He never asks for admirers, worshippers or adherents. No, he calls disciples. It is not adherents of a teaching but followers of a life Christ is looking for.

Christ understood that being a “disciple” was in innermost and deepest harmony with what he said about himself. Christ claimed to be the way and the truth and the life. For this reason, he could never be satisfied with adherents who accepted his teaching, especially with those who in their lives ignored it or let things take their usual course. His whole life on earth, from beginning to end, was destined solely to have followers and to make admirers impossible.

Christ came into the world with the purpose of saving, not instructing it. At the same time, as is implied in his saving work, he came to be the pattern, to leave footprints for the person who would join him, who would become a follower. This is why Christ was born and lived and died in lowliness. It is absolutely impossible for anyone to sneak away from the “pattern” with excuse and evasion on the basis that it, after all, possessed earthly and worldly advantages that they did not have. In that sense, to admire Christ is the false invention of a later age, aided by the presumption of “loftiness.” No, there is absolutely nothing to admire in Jesus, unless you want to admire poverty, misery and contempt.

What then, is the difference between an admirer and a follower? Followers are or strive to be what they admire. Admirers, however, keep themselves personally detached. They fail to see that what is admired involves a claim upon them and thus they fail to be or strive to be what they admire.

To want to admire instead of to follow Christ is not necessarily an invention by bad people. No, it is more an invention by those who spinelessly keep themselves detached, who keep themselves at a safe distance. Admirers are related to the admired only through the excitement of the imagination. To them, he is like an actor on the stage except that, this being real life, the effect he produces is somewhat stronger. But for their part, admirers make the same demands that are made in the theatre: to sit safe and calm. Admirers are only all too willing to serve Christ as long as proper caution is exercised, lest one personally come in contact with danger. As such, they refuse to accept that Christ’s life is a demand. In actual fact, they are offended at him. His radical, bizarre character so offends them that when they honestly see Christ for who he is, they are no longer able to experience the tranquillity they so much seek after. They know full well that to associate with him too closely amounts to being up for examination. Even though he “says nothing” against them personally, they know that his life tacitly judges theirs.

And Christ’s life indeed makes it manifest, terrifyingly manifest, what dreadful untruth it is to admire the truth instead of following it. When there is no danger, when there is dead calm, when everything is favourable to our Christianity, it is all too easy to confuse admirers with followers. And this can happen very quietly. Admirers can be in the delusion that the position they take is the true one when all they are doing is playing it safe. Give heed, therefore, to the call of discipleship!

If you have any knowledge at all of human nature, who can doubt that Judas was an admirer of Christ? And we know that Christ at the beginning of his work had many admirers. Judas was precisely an admirer and thus later became a traitor. It is just as easy to reckon as the stars that those who only admire the truth will, when danger appears, become traitors. Admirers are infatuated with the false security of greatness; but if there is any inconvenience or trouble, they pull back. Admiring the truth, instead of following it, is just as dubious a fire as the fire of erotic love, which at the turn of the hand can be changed into exactly the opposite, to hate, jealousy and revenge.

There is a story of yet another admirer, it was Nicodemus. Despite the risk to his reputation, despite the effort on his part, Nicodemus was only an admirer; he never became a follower.

It is as if he might have said to Christ, “If we are able to reach a compromise, you and I, then I will accept your teaching in eternity. But here in this world, no, that I cannot bring myself to do. Could you not make an exception for me? Could it not be enough if once in a while, at great risk to myself, I come to you during the night, but during the day (yes, I confess it, I myself feel how humiliating this is for me and how disgraceful, indeed also how very insulting it is toward you) to say ‘I do not know you?’”

See in what a web of untruth admirers can entangle themselves. Nicodemus, I am quite sure, was certainly well-meaning. I’m also sure he was ready to assure and reassure in the strongest expressions, words, and phrases that he accepted the truth of Christ’s teaching. Yet, is it not true that the more strongly people make assurances, while their lives still remain unchanged, the more they are only making a fool of themselves? If Christ had permitted a cheaper edition of being a follower (an admirer who swears by all that is high and holy that he or she is convinced) then Nicodemus might very well have been accepted. But he was not.

Now suppose that there is no longer any special danger, as it no doubt is in so many of our Christian countries, bound up with publicly confessing Christ. Suppose there is no longer need to journey in the night. The difference between following and admiring (between being or at least striving to be) still remains. Forget about this danger connected with confessing Christ and think rather of the real danger which is inescapably bound up with being a Christian. Does not the Way (Christ’s requirement to die to the world, to forgo the worldly, and his requirement of self-denial) contain enough danger? If Christ’s commandment were to be obeyed, would they not constitute a danger? Would they not be sufficient to manifest the difference between an admirer and a follower?

The difference between admirers and followers still remain, no matter where you are. Admirers never make any true sacrifices. They always play it safe. Though in words, phrases, songs, they are inexhaustible about how highly they prize Christ, they renounce nothing, give up nothing, will not reconstruct their lives, will not be what they admire and will not let their lives express what it is they supposedly admire. Not so for followers. No, no. Followers aspire with all their strength, with all their will to be what they admire. And then, remarkably enough, even though they are living amongst a “Christian people,” the same danger results for them as was once the case when it was dangerous to openly confess Christ. And because of the life of followers, it will become evident who the admirers are, for the admirers will become agitated with them. Even that these words are presented as they are here will disturb many, but then they must likewise belong to the admirers.

Comments are closed.