If Anon were one of my young clients, we would discover that this was a moment of “topic jumping,” and then see if we could figure out some ways to let conversational partners know that there’s going to be a shift in topic (e.g., “By the way,…”). Regardless, I would agree that Jesus was not female, not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Why is it called MENses, then? Full stop.
Of course, what is conveniently forgotten is that neither was he white, short-haired, dressed in flowing shining robes, English-speaking, or, by our western 21st century standards, physically clean, especially as far a bodily functions go. Nor, if contemporary accounts are to be believed, was he crucified with a nice little piece of cloth hiding his manhood, which, according to medical opinion, would have been swollen as the body lurched in the throes of suffocation. But then, we don’t talk about these things in our polite Christian circles. Oh – and he wasn’t a Christian.
Loved it! It does seem that at least sometimes madness=wisdom!
“Oh I think you’ll find that if Jesus had periods then she was female”
Um, I contradict this statement. [Though I’m w/ you re idiot trolls, and they’re clever-feeling-making]
I wish I had my own troll. His screen name would be “Forever Jimbo” and he would always tell me I’m going to go to Hell for all my “man poking.”