This is a real gem.
Perhaps I've been mislead by having a refined readership, but when someone says "gay man" to me I immediately think of KJ, Counterlight, Dennis and the soppy, Andrew Lloyd Weber loving Mexican. And the thought of any of them coercing a baby rabbit, let alone a parade ground full of squaddies, doesn't quite ring true with me.
From ONE NEWS NOW:
The head of a law firm that defends and promotes Christian heritage and moral values thinks there would be dire consequences for heterosexual service members if President Obama, with the help of an activist judge, "homosexualizes" the military.
The Defense Department announced Thursday it would comply with California Judge Virginia Phillips's order to stop enforcing the ban on homosexuals serving in the military. That same day, President Obama voiced his view that the military's current ban is unjust and discriminatory. However, he also pointed out that he wants it lifted "in an orderly fashion."
But Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), does not think the president cares about how unjust and discriminatory it will be for heterosexual service members when the military is taken over by radical homosexuals.
"If you try to have a sergeant drilling and overseeing a bunch of young men, and that sergeant happens to be homosexual, you can just imagine what kind of coercion there is going to be," he warns. "If this ever happens, you're going to see a lot of violence; you're going to see a lot of young men leaving the military, and you're going to have unintended consequences that can only be imagined today."
Thompson suggests there would be zero tolerance for anyone opposed to homosexuality, so he thinks lifting the ban would ultimately destroy the most effective fighting force in the history of the world.
COMMENT: The most effective fighting force in the history of the world?
That would be the Romans then. Just as I thought teh gay were responsible for the Fall of Rome.