There has been another exhibition of primatial hissy fitting in the Anglican Communion Football League. In a Division Two match, played earlier today, and reported on by THE TIMES ecclesiastical sports correspondent, Ruthy "Red Card" Gledhill, the captain of the Ugandan team, Henry "The Bishop" Orombi, picked up the ball in the middle of the match and stormed off to the changing room with it. It has emerged that his paddy was due to the failure of Anglican Football's governing body to change the rules of the game to suit what he wanted. Orombi has since sent a letter to the president of the ACFL, Rowan "Shinkicker" Williams (a.k.a. Williamsy) in which he states how upset he is that the other teams, especially the US team, continue to play the game according to the traditional rules. Thanks to Our Ruth, I am able to post his letter of resignation in full.

9th April 2010
The Most Rev. Rowan Williams
Archbishop of Canterbury
Lambeth Palace

Your Grace,

Easter greetings in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ!
In February I read with great interest Bishop Mouneer Anis’ letter of resignation from the Joint Standing Committee. I am grateful for his clarity and honesty. He has verbalized very well what many of us have thought and felt, and inspired me to write, as well.

As you know from our private conversations, I have absented myself for principled reasons from all meetings of the Joint Standing Committee since our Primates meeting in Dar es Salaam in 2007.

The first meeting of the Joint Standing Committee was later that year in New Orleans. At our Primates meeting in February 2007, we made certain requests of the Episcopal Church. In our Dar es Salaam communiqué we did not envision interference in the American House of Bishops while they were considering our requests.

For me to participate in a meeting in New Orleans before the 30th September deadline would have violated our hard-won agreement in Dar es Salaam and would have been another case of undermining our instruments of communion. My desire to uphold our Dar es Salaam communiqué was intended to strengthen our instruments of communion so we would be able to mature into an even more effective global communion of the Church of Jesus Christ than in the past.

Subsequent meetings of the Joint Standing Committee have included the Primate of the Episcopal Church (TEC) and other members of TEC, who are the very ones who have pushed the Anglican Communion into this sustained crisis. How can we expect the gross violators of Biblical Truth to sanction their own discipline when they believe they have done nothing wrong and further insist that their revisionist theology is actually the substance of Anglicanism? We have only to note the recent election and confirmation of an active Lesbian as a Suffragan Bishop in the Diocese of Los Angeles to realize that TEC has no interest in “gracious restraint,” let alone a moratorium on the things that have brought us to this point of collapse.

It is now impossible to regard their earlier words of “regret” as a serious gesture of reconciliation with the rest of the Communion.

Together with Bishop Mouneer, I am equally concerned, as you know, about the shift in the balance of powers among the Instruments of Communion. It was the Primates in 2003 who requested the Lambeth Commission on Communion that ultimately produced the Windsor Report. It was the Primates who received the Windsor Report at our meeting in Dromantine in 2005. It was the Primates, through our Dromantine Communique, who presented the appropriate “hermeneutic” through which to read the Windsor Report. That “hermeneutic,” however, has been obscured by the leadership at St. Andrew’s House who somehow created something we never envisioned called the “Windsor Process.”

The Windsor Report was not a “process.” It was a Report, commissioned by the Primates and received by the Primates. The Primates made specific and clear requests of TEC and the Anglican Church of Canada. When TEC, particularly, did not clearly answer our questions, we gave them more time in 2007 to clarify their position.

Suddenly, though, after the 2007 Primates Meeting in Dar es Salaam, the Primates no longer had a role to play in the very process they had begun. The process was mysteriously transferred to the Anglican Consultative Council and, more particularly, to the Joint Standing Committee. The Joint Standing Committee has now evolved into the “Standing Committee.” Some suggest that it is the Standing Committee “of the Anglican Communion.”

There is, however, no “Standing Committee of the Anglican Communion” The Standing Committee has never been approved in its present form by the Primates Meeting or the Lambeth Conference. Rather, it was adopted by itself, with your approval and the approval of the ACC. The fact that five Primates are included in no way represents our Anglican understanding of the role of Primates as metropolitan bishops of their provinces.

Anglicanism is a church of Bishops and, at its best, is conciliar in its governance. The grave crisis before us as a Communion is both a matter of faith as well as order. Matters of faith and order are the domain of Bishops. In a Communion the size of the Anglican Communion, it is unwieldy to think of gathering all the Bishops of the Communion together more frequently than the current pattern of every ten years. That is why the Lambeth Conference in 1998 resolved that the Primates Meeting should be able to “exercise an enhanced responsibility in offering guidance on doctrinal, moral and pastoral matters.” (Resolution III.6).

What has emerged, however, is the Standing Committee being given “enhanced responsibility” and the Primates being given “diminished responsibility,” even in regard to a process begun by them. Indeed, this Standing Committee has granted itself supreme authority over Covenant discipline in the latest draft. Under these circumstances, it has not been possible for me to participate in meetings of the Joint Standing Committee that has taken upon itself authority it has not been given.

Accordingly, I stand with my brother Primate, Bishop Mouneer Anis, in his courageous decision to resign from the Standing Committee. Many of us are in a state of resignation as we see how the Communion is moving away further and further into darkness, especially since the Primates’ meeting in Dar es Salaam.

Your Grace, I have urged you in the past, and I will urge you again. There is an urgent need for a meeting of the Primates to continue sorting out the crisis that is before us, especially given the upcoming consecration of a Lesbian as Bishop in America. The Primates Meeting is the only Instrument that has been given authority to act, and it can act if you will call us together.

The agenda for that meeting should be set by the Primates themselves at the meeting, and not by any other staff in advance of the meeting. I reiterate this point because you will recall our cordial December 2008 meeting with you, Chris Smith, and the other GAFCON Primates in Canterbury where we discussed the agenda for the Primates meeting to take place in Alexandria the following month. None of our submissions were included in the agenda. Likewise, at the beginning of the January 2009 Primates meeting I was asked to present a position paper on the effect of the crisis in the Communion from our perspective, but I was not informed in advance, so I did not come prepared. Yet, other presenters, including TEC and Canada, were given prior information and came very prepared. I have never received a formal written apology about that incident, and it has caused me to wonder if there are two standards at work in how a Primate is treated.

Finally, the meeting should not include the Primates of TEC and the Anglican Church of Canada who are proceeding with unbiblical practices that contradict the faith of Anglicanism. We cannot carry on with business as usual until order is brought out of this chaos.

Yours, in Christ,
The Most Rev Henry Luke Orombi

COMMENT: I think the short phrase, "Anglicanism is a church of Bishops," pretty much sums up Orombi's attitude towards democracy, the other provinces and the Communion of Saints.

The following is a copy of the comment I posted on Our Ruth's blog.

Bishop Henry Orombi may run his own province as if he was some sort of de facto pope. He may wish the whole of the Anglican Communion was governed by a college of de facto cardinals who are allowed to totally ignore their de facto pope in Canterbury whenever they disagree with him. But the truth is that, no matter how loud the power hungry bishops of the Communion state that they are in charge, they are not so in reality. There are various forms of governance in the different provinces of the Anglican Communion and The Grand Tufti's desire to replace them with a centralised, papal/episcopal model based on Roman Catholicism must be resisted to the death. We have seen recently that the order and governance of a church by those with a vested interest in maintaining their own positions of authority and privilege leads inevitably to the disgrace and ridicule of that church. We hated it when Tony Blair made his grab for presidential authority. The media should be just as distrustful when such power grabs take place in our Church of England. Open government is the future in all institutions. The last thing we need is a return to self-centred dictatorships. Somebody should send Henry Orombi a short history of The Reformation. It didn't happen in his country so he perhaps needs bringing up to speed on it.



  1. “Lesbian as Bishop in America.”

    Hmm… He capitalized “Lesbian”, so I’m wondering if he things that’s her official title. That would make me the “Gay Acolyte of Seattle.”

  2. Perhaps the departures of Orombi and Anis are evidence that a brilliant, but secret, strategy dreamed up by Rowan Williams is actually working.

    Couldn’t Ruth or you have given us an abridged version of the long, tedious letter?

  3. Yes, that phrase does leap out and smack you against the wall. Anglican = worldwide church = control by bishops. I’d love to send at least one LONG history of the Reformation; maybe “Reformation” by Diarmaid MacCulloch.

  4. If this becomes sign-on statement, let me be the first: I am the Reverend Lois T. Keen, TEC, and I endorse this statement in full.

  5. let me clarify which statement: I endorse MP’s statement (such sloppiness, Lois, tush. Must have been a “typtor” which is the WV for this comment.)

  6. Couldn’t Ruth or you have given us an abridged version of the long, tedious letter?

    We both did, right at the beginning. You chose for yourself to read beyond it.

  7. I choose to give primates outside my own province the same recognition they seem to give baptized persons outside episcopal orders, which is evidently none.

  8. Oh dear, Mimi. One day you are going to accidentally slip a sporting metaphor into one of your comments or posts without thinking. And you just know how unbearable I am going to be when you do.

  9. Rah, Rah, RAW, Zizz boom bah!

    Let´s hear it for HUMANITY as another GRANDSTANDING JERK sucks the hem of bigotry, ignorance, grandstanding and hate!

    (betcha he wants to be GAFCONNING POPE now that Akinola is fading into the night of fraternal hidesight)

    These deadly jokers actually believe what they deceive…block that kick!

  10. Something for you and me to look forward to, then, Jonathan. If I slip and don’t remember to block the sports metaphors, you’ll have a field day. Oops! I just slipped – twice.

    Well, that’s out of the way.

  11. It is all a big misunderstanding because we, none of us, can read English correctly!

    The Rev. Canon Alison Barfoot, Asst. to the Archbishop [Orumbi] for International Relations:

    “Archbishop Henry supports Bishop Mouneer in resigning from the JSC, but Archbishop Henry has not himself resigned. ‘I stand with my brother Primate’ means he supports his decision.”

    How stupid of us. I have an excuse, how did the rest of you lot make that mistake?

  12. A cousin of mine who is not in the faith (ours or any other), after one particularly nasty gathering of bishops in the Anglican Communion, turned to me and said, “No wonder they’re called primates.”

  13. Small world category: Alison Barfoot was the band director/instrumental music teacher at St. Stephen’s School (Alexandria, VA) for part of the time I taught there. Her undergraduate work was in music and she was a fairly decent clarinet player. I’d say she was there during the early 80s or so. I liked her and did a little performing with her from time to time. She was conservative but not beligerant about it nor did she seem to be reactionary. Quiet. Unassuming. (Never seemed to be the slightest interested in men, for what that’s worth…) When she went off to Trinity seminary I just thought it was because she was not very high church and more on the evangelical side. Who would have thought she would end up supporting and working for the very same bishop who is most hell-bent on undermining the Anglican Communion?

  14. Dah•veed, those pesky second thoughts! Perhaps it suddenly dawned on Abp. Orombi that by resigning, he leaves the field to the enemy.

    Munts! (WV)

  15. Abp. Orombi seems to fail to recognize that the constitution and canons of the Episcopal Church are a bicameral body, similar to the United States’ bicameral legislature. “The Lesbian Bishop” was duly elected through due process of the constitution and canons of our church.

    Sounds to me he is asking us to change our entire church polity to suit his “church of bishops.”

    Not. Gonna. Happen.

  16. I’m thinking it might have been Ruth Gledhill, Paul. It would make sense and it speeds up the delivery of news to the public. In fact, there is a possibility that there is no crisis in the Anglican Communion. It could all have been invented by Ruth. There is probably no such person as Akinola or Jeferts Schori or even Rowan Williams. In fact, I may not exist and worse still I’m not existing whilst having a conversation with Paul, who doesn’t exist either. Damn journalists!

  17. DJCinSB FTW! 😀

    I am therefore, KJ, THE GenderQueer Eucharistic Minister in Albion (MI).

  18. And what makes you think that journalists exist either, O Mad One?

    I suggest that they have no more existence than Renee Descartes, who anyway is dead.

  19. From time to time, KJ has slightly unsaintly moments. I’m just saying.

    OT, but how the feck do I put up a post at the Chin Wag? I don’t expect you to say here, Jonathan, but you don’t answer my emails, therefore I ask for help here. Or did you exclude me from the privilege to post without telling me?

  20. Did you get a man to help you?

    Who? Theodora or me? If you’re asking me, and you’d read carefully you’d have seen that I said I remembered out all on my own. I don’t know where the “out” came from. Freudian, I suppose.

    Slizie! WV

  21. “But, Kj, you are THE Gay Acolyte of Seattle. All the others are mere also rans.”

    Yes, yes, I am a saint, but try to not be prideful about it. However, I can assure you that I am not THE Gay Acolyte of Seattle, though you certainly have identified a worthy aspiration.

  22. “From time to time, KJ has slightly unsaintly moments. I’m just saying.”

    I find Mimi’s lack of confidence in my character….. disturbing.