An elderly Hindu man on Wednesday won the right to be cremated on a traditional funeral pyre in Britain, after a ruling by the Court of Appeal in London. Davender Ghai, who moved to Britain from Kenya in 1958 and is the founder of the Anglo-Asian Friendship Society, was refused a permit for an open-air cremation site in Northumberland, northeast England, in 2006.

The 71-year-old lost a challenge to the decision at the High Court in London last May, but on Wednesday the Appeal Court said Ghai's wishes could be accommodated within existing legislation. Ghai welcomed the ruling, although he said his court battle had drained him "physically, mentally and financially."

"Now if I go tomorrow I will go peacefully, because I know that I will have a good send-off. Everyone should live and die according to their own religion," he told reporters outside the court.

The government, named as an interested party in the case, argued during the case that "others in the community would be upset and offended... and would find it abhorrent that human remains were being burned in this way."

But Ghai's lawyers argued that denying him the right to an open-air pyre conflicts with human rights legislation which protects, among other rights, the right to freedom of religious belief.

Judge David Neuberger asked Ghai's lawyer what his client wanted and was told the funeral pyre should be made of wood and be open to the sky -- but it could be surrounded by walls and the pyre covered with a roof with an opening.

"It seems to us that Mr. Ghai's religious and personal beliefs as to how his remains should be cremated once he dies can be accommodated within current cremation legislation," said Neuberger, who led a three-judge panel.

COMMENT: I have always fully backed Davender's campaign on the OCICBW... blog. It has always seemed to me to be a reasonable request, easily accommodated with the benefit to race relations in my country far outweighing any offence it might cause. Furthermore, I hope we shall all be able soon to take advantage of this ruling. Having seen the ovens in crematoria and having peered into many cold, dank graves in municipal burial grounds, I quite fancy the idea of being burned al freso - after I've gone to meet my maker, of course.

So, good on yer, old man.

You fought well, with integrity, and I hope it is many years before you need to take advantage
of your victory

For getting the

bureaucrats and
my ungenerous
fellow citizens to
see sense, a very
difficult task, in deed,
Davender Ghai is our...





  1. As long as FIF and AC-NA do not try to claim the precedent should extend to living Episcopalians, I am down with it.


  2. I think I’ll create a religion that requires our bodies to simply rot and decay in the open and demand then to have my body delivered to Congress…I better get to work, I think that I have quite a legal battle ahead of me…

  3. Just keep it downwind, that’s all I ask…

    [Seriously, having seen it—on the Tube—in Varanasi: don’t they pour lots of ghee on the pyres? Oh, the Rich, Buttery Aroma! ;-X]

  4. Renz, the religion exists. Look up traditional Lakota practices. Not sure how you convert to Lakota though, could be an issue.


  5. I’ve always liked the Zoroastrian thing of being put out on the mountain for the vultures to eat. I wouldn’t mind that. I like the idea of going to feed the birds. If you think about it, most bodies, at least if it’s up to nature, feed the birds, the worms or the fishes. Which feels right to me.

    Having said this, good on Davender, and well done him.

  6. I am going to have to correct you there, Cathy. Zoroastrians place the bodies on towers for the vultures to eat. You are thinking of Tibetan sky burials which is the same idea as the Zoroastrians but with mountains not towers. Also with Tibetan sky burials, the deceased friends hack the body into small pieces on the mountaintop so that the birds can pick them up and take the dead person into the sky.

  7. Oooo, get you!!!

    I’m sure you’re right, MP. But they both have the same idea – to leave the corpse for the birdies to snack on. Either way, I like their style.

  8. This is so unfair.

    Petition to be burned in the open air and its fine, petition to burn a lot of other people in the open and suddenly it’s “religious oppression” or a “new Inquisition” or something.

    Politically-correct madness.